Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The funny thing is that Bambu didn't innovate. They just made it work really, really well.

I've owned a few 3d printers, including a kit printer, and the Bambu doesn't have any tech that other printers don't. They just always work well, and are easy to maintain.

Others are finally catching up, though. Snapmaker really scared them with the U1 (which is getting insane reviews), and Prusa has finally stepped up and started innovating again, too. The Centauri Carbon is another really good entry-level printer as well and it's eating into Bambu's market.





> The funny thing is that Bambu didn't innovate. They just made it work really, really well.

Everything wrong with the western tech academic/industrial complex in two sentences.


Being that “Making something work really,really well” isn’t seen as innovation?

Important use of “just” to downplay it too.

“The funny thing is that Bambu didn't innovate. They just made it work really, really well. ”

That’s basically Apple’s MO


What do you mean they didn't innovative? The H2D and the AMS are new techniques and their latest release is certainly innovative with the 6 extra hotends

They didn't, though?

The H2D's printer/laser combo was done by Snapmaker before that, and the "2 heads" thing was done numerous times in many different ways before the H2D.

The AMS may not have looked exactly like that, but the same idea was already in place by Prusa at least.

Tool changers are not new, and the way that the extra hotends are held and dispensed was already in use in industrial machines. The "6 extra hotends" thing ... I'm willing to admit that might have been an innovation not yet seen in the 3d printing space, but BondTech announced their INDX before Bambu announced their solution. Both were in R&D for years before that, of course.

But Bambu was big and popular long before their current generation of printers. Only the AMS could be seen to contribute to their popularity, and again, it was because it works so well, not because it was a new idea.


> didn't innovate. They just made it work really, really well.

I thought that was the difference between "invention" and "innovation"?


"make changes in something established, especially by introducing new methods, ideas, or products." according to Oxford.

It's a stretch to me to think that "make it work reliably" is a new idea, and their products and methods were all already done by others, but less reliably.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: