Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On the other hand Texas seems to have a problem with it. But say you're right. Does "not a bad deal" make people enthusiastic about it?

Why go out there and evangelize about a half-assed rewards card that comes with privacy leaks? That's what I'm asking.





I'll speak for myself. I think it's pretty universal that when someone says "I want X", people believe them. Where I find myself slightly rarer is that when someone's purchasing decisions says "I want X", I believe them.

People seem earnestly willing to trade their attention and data for ~a couple hundred dollars (this was my best estimate of how much cheaper ads make TVs - about $50 per year of ownership with 5ish years of ownership typical). I am much more worried that people who are not earnestly willing (me and the 5 other weirdos mentioned in my OP) don't really have a good outlet. It would be a genuine loss if the government no longer let people trade their attention and data for a cheaper TV, according to the people (I really had to resist capitalizing there) themselves. I don't have to like it to believe them.


I understand that you want to answer your own question, not my question. That's fine.

I told you why I care about defending this (although, I wouldn't say "enthusiastic"). You don't have to like my answer.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: