Dual-stack with a public IPv4 address is by far a preferable way to access the v... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		topranks 27 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I spent a week without IPv4 (2023) Dual-stack with a public IPv4 address is by far a preferable way to access the v4 internet than being stuck behind a provider NAT64 box. Totally understand why carriers may want IPv6 mostly and a v4-free core. But as an end user dual stack just seems simpler.

jcgl 25 days ago [–]

Providers can do v6-only in their core while still providing public v4 to users. SIIT if they can still afford a public IP per customer, and MAP-T if they can’t.

jcgl 25 days ago | [–]

Misspoke: more like a CLAT thing/464XLAT, rather than SIIT, I think

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact