Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A failure of reading comprehension, or a visceral reaction to a generalized statement that pertains to you personally, does not make one dumb.

Defending your mistakes doesn't either, but I can understand the confusion.

Happy holidays.



Again me thinks the fool speaks of himself.

(You can’t engagement logically technically or even correctly here and keep Spouting others are wrong. Think hard on how poorly you comprehension here is even when explained why you are Wrong.)


I'm struggling to find my error in this thread. Please quote my statement and your points of disagreement.


Continuous circling is tiresome troll. Just stop.

Points have been illustrated contradicting the statement. No points have been made supporting it.

Your argument boils down to “all x is bad is valid by default and all Ys that contradict are inherently ‘statistically invalid’”. Do you not get how horribly dumb your logic is?

By this logic I could state all HNErs posting on Christmas are idiots and wrong by default. This of course can’t by contradicted by any statement you make because you are just a data point of one and therefore invalid. Also the original point is supported with exactly 0 data points so in actuality data point of 1 > 0. So my guy. Jesus. Learn stats. Or anything.


Are we agreeing that neither of us can find my error in this thread?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: