> humans aren’t reading code, so no need for it, ai can write everything in ASM & C, keep everything fast and economical.

This is a great plan; I would encourage everyone using AI to follow this strategy. The resulting smoking craters will have many job opportunities for human-written code that works.

Surely AI also needs guardrails?

AI needs heavy fortifications, moats and watchtowers around it.

People are still going to read the PR regardless of how it was created.

In some environments this is a hard requirement, and will be hard to break. Places where the code is know to have big impact / blast radius and can’t be wrong.

In other environments (most startups founded in the last six months) no human is ever reading any of the code. It’s kinda terrifying but I think it’s where we are going. And here I would argue having strict compilers is way more important.

That's fascinating and insane. Rust will help, but I can't see that working well. In my experience LLMs (even Claude) need quite a bit of handholding.

Perhaps people will move to stricter programming languages try to counter the slop issues