True. According to RKearney in this thread, Netflix does that too. But isn't that, too, a break of network neutrality? The moment you start accepting content-provider specific equipment, aren't you preferring them over those that don't provide equipment?
Wouldn't accepting equipment from one provider compel you to accept from others too in order to stay neutral.
I don't see anything that says they wouldn't accept equipment?
"If your endpoint drives enough traffic, we're open to solutions" doesn't seem silly.
What about ISPs that provide mirrors? An example I've used before was Australian ISPs providing steam, linux, etc mirrors to save their transoceanic costs. Is that still neutral?
Wouldn't accepting equipment from one provider compel you to accept from others too in order to stay neutral.