I love arq but run into an issue where my laptop fans spin up every time a backup is run. Is there an option to `nice` the daemon so it uses less cpu but takes a little longer? Arq on os x
Are things progressing with the Amazon Cloud Drive (Unlimited Everything) support? I think would get you a bunch of new users. I'm really eager to try it out.
This is great news! Any chance I can use this to backup to Hubic's service? In theory I could mount Hubic on a Rapsberry and then sftp to the Raspberry from Arq, but it would be great if I could do it directly.
Don't know enough about what you're describing. If you can mount Hubic as a drive, then maybe mount it to your Mac, and then tell Arq to SFTP to localhost. (Backing up to a local folder is on the to-do list but the SFTP approach is a workaround.)
I still use Backblaze to backup my media server (several TBs of data), but I recently switched to Arq on my laptop. It is fast, reliable, and at least if your data requirements aren't too vast, very cheap.
As a long time crashplan user, I backup a few Tb of data and use the key based encryption. Does arq fall flate in comparison to anyone? I like the sound of this, but I am wondering if I gain anything versus using cradhplan to just write the files locally instead of sending to crashplans storage.
I wonder. Assume you do not have arqbackup, and--for the sake of your short open format comment--arq_restore is outdated. You have downloaded all the data chunks (the many, many, many arq creates), how do you go by to decrypt it and get the original data in working state?
I'm not sure what you mean by outdated; it seems to work fine. If not, you read https://www.arqbackup.com/s3_data_format.txt and write your own. In contrast, what do you do with your Crashplan data if you don't have access to Crashplan? It's lost.
I don't really care much for the Windows version, but I'm a user of Arq on Mac OS. I used CrashPlan and Backblaze before that, for a couple of years, but had issues with both.
I would like to point out something many people overlook. If you use an online backup service, check how decryption is done. If you have to supply your decryption password to an on-line form, somebody has access to your data, and all the encryption has been for nothing (this was my problem with Backblaze).
Arq is great, because it decouples storage from backup. You pay for Arq, which buys you a backup program, and you buy storage separately, from any of the supported providers. You can also switch storage providers over the long term. I am very happy with this approach.
Arq has also proven to be much more reliable than either Crashplan or Backblaze's client app.
- especially: owning the encryption keys [1].
- agnostic of the storage (S3, Glacier, Dropbox etc. can be used)
- documented backup format
[1] https://www.haystacksoftware.com/blog/2014/10/its-not-about-...